tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5694390946037511355.post5982289010661736660..comments2024-03-29T01:09:48.567-04:00Comments on EV Grieve: Critics dislike NYU 2031 even more than NYU 2010Unknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5694390946037511355.post-91880962282423775322010-04-15T18:37:33.905-04:002010-04-15T18:37:33.905-04:00positively albert speerpositively albert speerKen Machttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09100185198750536244noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5694390946037511355.post-79454016310524325282010-04-15T13:47:24.107-04:002010-04-15T13:47:24.107-04:00@blueglass - that's actually not such a bad id...@blueglass - that's actually not such a bad idea, if the expansion actually happens. The building is already there and, traffic-wise, it probably wouldn't change much. I don't get why NYU *must* be in Manhattan - why not build a compound for itself outside the city? If their argument is they must have the "urban experience," then it doesn't make any sense to keep destroying the city.Laura Goggin Photographyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15517481509431547970noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5694390946037511355.post-13298913305365585512010-04-15T12:18:50.541-04:002010-04-15T12:18:50.541-04:00nyu probably will "rescue" st vincents.
...nyu probably will "rescue" st vincents.<br />my scenario is that they will wait till st vincents is useless and the community desperate.<br />all those unprotected (no close emergency room) students (who ride special buses), and then the neighborhood folks who also need a full service hospital.<br />and then nyu will swoop in to grab up another piece of real estate and pretend to be the shining knight on a white horse, while they add the space to their expansion plan and barter for no restrictions or landmark limitations.blueglasshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06962541644336420707noreply@blogger.com