Monday, November 20, 2017

Report: Participants were paid to take part in a rally in support of 9th Street dorm project



On Friday, an organization called East Village Cares held a rally at City Hall in support of turning the former P.S 64 and CHARAS/El Bohio community center on Ninth Street into a dorm.

According to the Daily News, some of the 30 people who rallied behind organizer Jose de Yarza, co-owner of Donostia on Avenue B, were hired extras.

The News reported that they obtained a copy of the casting email that was seeking people to "beef up attendance" for the rally in exchange for a rate of "$50 CASH / 2.5 hour booking."

One person holding a sign at the event confirmed attending as a result of the casting call. Another declined to answer, saying it wouldn’t be right to discuss whether he’d been paid. Two others approached by the News denied being paid or getting the casting call email.

It seeks “individuals of all ages,” in particular those living in the East Village or Lower East Side, having family or other “significant connections” there or an ability to “speak and advocate about the neighborhood.”

“Note this is a real live protest, and protestors MUST look real and be enthusiastic and verbal about the subject. Signs will be provided by production,” it read.

An EVG reader shared part of the pitch email for the work...



Gotham Government Relations & Communications, the lobbying firm who reportedly organized the rally on behalf of East Village Cares and P.S. 64 landlord Gregg Singer, strongly denied the use of paid extras.

“We absolutely categorically deny any connection to any of those things that are alleged,” founding partner Bradley Gerstman said, adding he had no knowledge of the casting company.

And...

De Yarza said he recognized between a dozen and 15 of the people at the rally as neighborhood residents or activists, and said he had “no knowledge of anybody being paid to be there.”

The Villager reported in its current issue that Gotham Government Relations was "best known for engineering the announcement of Donald Trump’s presidential campaign, complete with cheering paid actors."

The Villager also reported that Singer has retained Gotham's services for $12,000 a month, starting this past July.

The landmarked building between Avenue B and Avenue C is back in the headlines after Mayor de Blasio said last month that his administration would take steps to reacquire the property ... without offering any further details on how the city would do this. (The building was also a contentious issue in the District 2 race for City Council. Read more here and here.)

Singer bought the property from the city in 1998. He wants to turn the landmarked property into a dorm called University Square, and continues in a holding pattern while the DOB maintains a Stop Work Order on the building. (Adelphi University has reportedly signed a lease for space here.)

Community activists, preservationists and some local elected officials have long been opposed to Singer's plans, and want to see a return to use as a cultural and community center.

In a recently published article on the topic, The Indypendent included a statement from Gotham stating in part: "The East Village has changed in the 20 years since P.S. 64 was sold. The original group that occupied the building has no presence in today’s community."

Last Monday, Community Board 3's Arts & Cultural Affairs Subcommittee passed a resolution supporting de Blasio's call to reacquire the property, as Patch reported. The full Board is expected to vote on the resolution next Tuesday.

17 comments:

  1. $12,000 a month?! To pay a few extras $50 for 2 /2 hours? It's good to see Singer getting ripped off like that.

    I wonder what Jose de Yarza's angle is. More foot traffic for his bar? More likely some Singer cash. I can't imagine the city getting the building back but hopefully it gets dragged out until Singer goes bankrupt. And then the building can become a five story Duane Reade and fit right into the current neighborhood.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Save you casting money Mr. Singer, De Blasio talk of taking back this building was just about getting re-elected not that he has accomplished that he will be back in your and all the other big developer's pockets soon enough.

    ReplyDelete
  3. You can tell these are fake protestors from the picture in the Daily News. They are all holding up homemade looking signs that were obviously mass produced by the same person to make the protest look authentic. You need to make your signs look a lot different if you want to fool people. And they need to carry authentic messages. One of them reads, “Beautify The East Vaillge. Dorm Now.” Others read “Who is Aaron Sosnick?” Yes, these are the issues that real East Villagers care about. Dummies.

    The UN protests up at Dag Hammarskold Plaza are just like this. I have seen the Turkish and Iranaian embassies bussing in black paid protestors from church groups in Harlem who have no idea why they are even there. They are given flags and signs to wave around, Apparently the Turks and Iranians can’t find enough real protestors to make their crowds look important. Nice try Singer, your dorm project is dead as a doornail, and as phony as a paid Trump supporter.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Boycott Donastia? Can I boycott a place I've never been to? The LAST thing we need in the E.V. is another dorm. Dorms have been the death of the E.V..

    ReplyDelete
  5. (Reminds me of the line that formed at the Biscuit Boys place and that girl who cried and then picked-up and ate the biscuit after dropping it.)

    I was walking by Donostia when they first opened up and was looking through the restaurant and was curious what it was and when id it open. A worker who was setting up or cleaning inside the restaurant saw me and he hurried to go out, eyeing me all the time and asked "may I help you" and basically chased me out the front of Donostia. That kind of attitude and paranoia and vainglory are a reflection of its owner and the establishment.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Wow, just when you think things (and people) can't get lower, someone comes along to prove how much lower it can all go.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Congratulations, Donostia, you have made Santa's Naughty List.

    ReplyDelete
  8. they're called Crisis Actors

    ReplyDelete
  9. This is all just a battle of the wallets, a bunch of people are likely being paid on both sides and odds are whoever shells out more is gonna build whatever they want. Kinda crazy that owning a property doesn't mean anything if someone can just pay more to stop you from building on it. Money makes the world go round it seems. Sad that progress is stopped just because people's wallets don't agree with each other.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Anonymous 11:17. Interesting we had the exact opposite experience. Just before they opened (if you remember they were under construction forever) we popped our heads in to see what was what. A man we presumed to be an owner could not have been nicer. Invited us in for a tour even though it was still a construction zone. Subsequently a friend from the neighborhood held a small birthday thing there. It seemed fine enough, unremarkable in either direction really. In any event I'd guess that nobody who lives here wants another dorm. Also though lots has changed one thing that still counts around here is sincerity. Hiring paid demonstrators is insincere and will cost the owner goodwill and business. Plus we kind of liked the pet food store that used to be there. Or next door whichever. Xo

    ReplyDelete
  11. @2:13 PM - Nobody's getting paid on the "stop Singer" side and you know that. Because there's no money in community activism. Ever.

    Why owners can't just build whatever they want is called a "zoning law", and this is around the 100th anniversary of NYC's, the first in the nation. When you take a break from trolling you should look into it. But stay on the clock.

    ReplyDelete
  12. @2:48 PM That is where Zee Pets was before moving to 13th street and then closing. Next door is where the longtime Ave B locksmith lives. Owner was nice to me before opening as well. He was trying to get me to sign his booze petition.

    ReplyDelete
  13. For the record I have nothing to do with Singer - Charas was for sale for 3 million. Singer bought it. It was only after he announced his plans for the building, and the "rich" people at the Christadora decided that they did not want to live next to a dormitory, that the elected officials got involved. No one cared until the Christadora started organizing. I never understood why the Christodora did not buy the property. 3 million is pocket change for those people.

    ReplyDelete
  14. @10:00 PM

    "For the record" writes anonymous. Nothing to do with Singer would imply that you don't receive money from singer or his shill group eastvillagecares. Unlikely so prove it, Mr de Yarza.

    The idea that "no one cared" until the Christadora started organizing is weird. That history, including the Christadoras' involvement in stopping Singers' initial 25 story building, was well documented by local journalists at the time.

    ReplyDelete
  15. To Anonymous at 10 PM:

    It also has to do with the stipulation before the bidding began [I was at the auction] that the building was to remain a community facility. CHARAS wasn't "for sale for 3 million;" there was a bidding process and Singer was an anonymous bidder. The day after the auction, someone revealed that they had found the corporation that bought CHARAS was called "Sing Fina."

    It wasn't just the Christodora residents that were organizing; community members and displaced artist tenants of CHARAS were also—and have been—involved. Get yer facts straight.

    ReplyDelete
  16. @10:00pm: Zip it, troll; your "alternative facts" are untrue.

    ReplyDelete
  17. http://thevillager.com/2017/11/22/trumped-up-dorm-rally-used-hired-actors/

    ReplyDelete

Your remarks and lively debates are welcome, whether supportive or critical of the views herein. Your articulate, well-informed remarks that are relevant to an article are welcome.

However, commentary that is intended to "flame" or attack, that contains violence, racist comments and potential libel will not be published. Facts are helpful.

If you'd like to make personal attacks and libelous claims against people and businesses, then you may do so on your own social media accounts. Also, comments predicting when a new business will close ("I give it six weeks") will not be approved.