Monday, August 19, 2024

Prepping Theatre 80 for its next chapter on St. Mark's Place

Photos and reporting by Stacie Joy 

Workers began prepping 78-80 St. Mark's Place, the historic theater building just west of First Avenue, for its next chapter at the storied address. 

On Wednesday, a dumpster arrived outside Theatre 80... and workers were spotted hauling out items from inside...
First, here is a quick recap of what has happened here in recent years. 

During a bankruptcy auction in May 2023, business and life partners Ori Kushnir and Sivan Lahat, residents and former commercial tenants (Foxface) of the building, reportedly put in the highest bid at $8.8 million. 

The previous longtime owners, Lorcan Otway and his wife, Genie Gilmore Otway, were ordered off the property by a court-appointed bankruptcy trustee in April 2023. (You can read more background here and here.) The Otways lived in an apartment at the address that also housed Theatre 80, the William Barnacle Tavern and the Museum of the American Gangster. 

Howard Otway, Lorcan's father, bought the venue in 1964. (The buildings here date to the mid-1840s.)

The renovation plans

In an email, Kushnir explained that they're preparing the building for asbestos abatement, removing broken appliances and furniture, old carpets, paperwork, etc. No construction is taking place. 

"Once that's done, we plan comprehensive renovations with sustainability, housing, accessibility and preservation in mind," said Kushnir, who currently operates Foxface Natural on Avenue A with Lahat. 

He outlined several goals they aim to achieve, all currently pending approval: 

• Improve the layout downstairs so that the bar can be expanded back to its original size (it was cut in half when Theatre 80 was built in the late 1960s, Kushnir said. 
• Create a total of at least seven legal apartments. ("As things stand, there are only two legal apartments in the whole building," he said.) 
• Repair the facade, roofs, and back wall and improve insulation to reduce heating and cooling energy needs. 
• Make the bar, theater, and first-floor apartments ADA-accessible. 
• "Preserve the theater as a public venue and retain key elements of the facade, such as the blade sign that has seen many names," Kushnir said.
And the big question: Are any commercial tenants lined up for a post-renovation building? 

"Not yet," Kushnir said. "We spoke with several theater companies but haven't found the right fit." 

The building's past lives include a Prohibition-era speakeasy, a bar-cabaret in the 1930s-1940s, a jazz club in the 1950s, and, starting in 1967, an Off-Broadway venue where "You're a Good Man, Charlie Brown" debuted in March 1967. From the 1970s through the early 1990s, a revival movie theater often showed double features. 

Kushnir shared this photo from the mid-1960s...

23 comments:

  1. Excellent. A movie house again I hope. Saw flamenco there. Also left political forums. Save the east village!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Noche Flamenca, right? I'm proud to say my wife and I first saw them there and have become fervent fans as they've grown and expanded their shows to other venues! I'll always treasure that theater for that reason.

      Delete
  2. After Theater 80 movie rep, The Pearl Theater Co was there, performing the classics.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I wonder what happened to Lorcan and his wife. Last I heard they were living in a church. Sucks that the new owner didn’t allow them to stay in their apartment.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It wasn't up to the new owners. A court-appointed bankruptcy trustee was in charge of the proceedings. They were no longer legally allowed to be in the building. The Otways left about 6 weeks before the bankruptcy auction.

      Delete
  4. Foxface is great, and I have high hopes and crossed fingers that they’ll treat this historic building with the respect it’s due. air would be great to have another active and affordable performance venue in the nabe.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Lorcan and Genie moved upstate but I don't know where.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Wasn't the Museum of the American Gangster also there? Will that be part of the new space?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It would be awesome if the new owners were able to preserve the building's heritage as a speakeasy; I don't know if that's a priority for them, but it would certainly be another revenue stream.

      Delete
  7. So happy there's new owner to this awfully long time neglected building.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The building was not neglected at all. I was in the bar a few days before the eviction, and I saw a show there the week before. Business was going well. Don't know why you'd share an untruth, I guess you must work in real estate.

      Delete
  8. The revival movie house was my favorite era. My apartment had a bathtub in the kitchen, pull-string lights etc so going to a black and white double-feature felt of a piece with it. I wish the new owners all the best with this giant project.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Re: "Not yet," Kushnir said. "We spoke with several theater companies but haven't found the right fit." “Just realized how sadly cynical I have become. Saw the developers statement and thought sure, the next statement will be we couldn’t find any theater or arts group that was the right fit so we are renting it to a restaurant group ie more $$$.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It's less of a cynicism and more of an auto trigger. New owners did nothing wrong yet, but let's hate them anyway.

      Delete
    2. Of course! Restaurant groups are lining up to invest millions in a windowless terraced set-back space designed to be a theater.

      Delete
  10. They should get Soho Rep in! They've had to leave their space on Walker Street. Also any other native NYCers reading this and thinking "Hey, could have been worse!"

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. SoHo Rep is still around? I first knew of them back in 1980, when I first came to the city; I was living in the Parkside Evangeline on Gramercy Park and a woman who also lived there was in a production of theirs.

      When I first saw the headline to this, I thought it WAS worse; this looks like it may not be that bad.

      Delete
  11. Lorcan was a good guy, and he made this theater interesting. Among other things, he had a bar, and AA meetings on the same premises. Funny stuff. Too bad he lost the place.

    ReplyDelete
  12. So happy these two took over. It sounds like they are the best stewards for this place.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Bring back the Barnacle, it was perfect!

    ReplyDelete
  14. It is a fact that most of the comments in support of the current owners are anonymous. Im going on record as a friend and former employee of Lorcan Otway and Jeannie Otway that I am appalled at the events that transpired during the bankruptcy and believe that the trustee was dancing to the current owners tune when she evicted Lorcan and Jeannie 6 weeks BEFORE the auction.. I personally avoid the block when i am in town so many good memories there Theatre 80 was a beacon of culture, celebrity and humanity.
    Jay (Blonde Boy) Wilson

    ReplyDelete
  15. I hope that theater 80 will be a theater again. The arts are disappearing in the East Village. Folks would like to find arts and cultural events in their own hood.

    ReplyDelete
  16. I find anonymous comments to be a little suspicious too, Jay; it's not difficult to sign in, even with an assumed name.

    Speaking for myself, I was never able to go to Foxface™ because as far as I could see, they had nothing vegan available. I live just a few blocks away so I'm surprised I didn't see the dumpster in the photo until now.

    I live just east of Tompkins and will be watching the building; it's a good thing there are plans to keep it as a theater but I'm wary—what with the way things have been going for other neighborhood sites.

    ReplyDelete

Your remarks and lively debates are welcome, whether supportive or critical of the views herein. Your articulate, well-informed remarks that are relevant to an article are welcome.

However, commentary that is intended to "flame" or attack, that contains violence, racist comments and potential libel will not be published. Facts are helpful.

If you'd like to make personal attacks and libelous claims against people and businesses, then you may do so on your own social media accounts. Also, comments predicting when a new business will close ("I give it six weeks") will not be approved.