Friday, April 18, 2025

Ongoing leadership turmoil at Sixth Street Community Center sparks tensions

Photos and reporting by Stacie Joy

The Sixth Street Community Center (SSCC), a hub for activism, education and community support in the East Village, is facing continued internal and external upheaval following a decision by the Board of Directors to fire longtime Executive Director Howard Brandstein. 

The dismissal has sparked public outcry, prompted protests, and raised questions about leadership, transparency and the future of the nearly 50-year-old institution. (Read our previous post here for more background.)
Brandstein, a co-founder of the Center, stated that he was abruptly dismissed without severance pay or notice early on April 8. According to him, the termination letter alleged financial impropriety and misconduct — claims he categorically denies. 

"This board is out to destroy me, plain and simple," he wrote in a public statement, citing not only his dismissal but also the loss of access to personal items, digital files, and ongoing project work, including a community land trust partnership to develop affordable housing.
The volunteer board (pictured below from left), Chair Aminata "Amikole" Maraesa, Treasurer Ashwin Rastogi, Vice-Chair Sarah Johnson and Secretary Periwinkle Torres, has declined to discuss specific employment matters, citing legal limitations. 

In a public statement, the board announced that it had made a "very difficult decision" to transition leadership "in the best interest of the center and its mission," adding that it is committed to maintaining SSCC's programs and its role in the neighborhood.
"We remain focused on strengthening our programs, engaging with the community, and keeping the Center accessible in all ways," the board wrote, acknowledging the disruption caused by protests and urging respect for the safety of youth program participants and staff. 

Deputy Director Jen Chantrtanapichate, who is departing on maternity leave soon, expressed both gratitude for Brandstein's legacy and concern for the Center’s future. 

"I only wish Howard the best," she said. "But I also want the Community Center to survive beyond any one person. That's the embodiment of a healthy organization."

Brandstein claims that the root of the conflict lies in financial tensions that arose during and after the pandemic, including emergency loans, government grants, and disagreements over budget decisions and access to funds. 

A key flashpoint may have been his request to open a new bank account to cover overdrafts — a move he says was necessary but viewed by the board as grounds for dismissal. Last year, Brandstein was placed on a professional improvement plan (PIP), after which he filed a complaint alleging discrimination. 

Both sides agree that tensions had been escalating for over a year. 

SSCC staff, in a statement shared via social media, acknowledged they were not notified in advance of the board's decision to remove Brandstein. They expressed appreciation for his contributions while emphasizing their commitment to the Center's work. 

The staff also pushed back against what they described as misinformation about the organization's services. 

"The 'Friends of Sixth Street' group do not represent our center's programs or work and have fabricated claims," they wrote, attributing program changes to broader funding shortfalls — decrease in funding from the current federal administration — rather than internal neglect. 

Chantrtanapichate also stated, "The Friends of Sixth Street are not friends of Sixth Street — they are friends of Howard."

Community reactions have been mixed. 

Mammad Mahmoodi, co-founder of the mutual aid group EVLovesNYC, which previously served meals from the Center, called the board's actions "disgusting," criticizing the use of police and the sudden removal of Brandstein. (Board members said that Brandstein gained access to the building after his dismissal, and they called the 9th Precinct to make sure he left the premises without incident.)

"This is a community center and supposed to be for the community," stated Mahmoodi, who was not speaking on behalf of EVLovesNYC. "Not a playground for folks to do their power trips." 

We've heard from others that it's time for a change, that the Center needs more vibrant leadership during increasingly perilous economic times.

At the heart of the conflict are questions of governance, sustainability and accountability. Can an organization rooted in activism and grassroots leadership navigate a contentious leadership transition without losing community trust? 

The board said it is currently handling day-to-day operations with volunteer leadership and remains open to dialogue about the Center's future. 

"We are exploring a new leadership structure," the four members told EVG during an on-site interview this week, while affirming that "SSCC remains open for regular programming, with all existing programs, partners, and staff in place."

As one longtime staff member noted, "There are many perspectives and experiences that have not been considered. We hope the community can see the full picture — not just one side."
For now, Sixth Street Community Center continues its youth programs, food distribution, and neighborhood services amid public demonstrations and emotional appeals. What comes next for the storied East Village institution remains to be seen.
Previously on EV Grieve

7 comments:

  1. Firing, changing the locks, calling the cops--that's something you do if you find out your director was a rapist, molester, thief, or a violent monster. Not someone who has had a peanuts salary--and often no salary--and dedicated his life to building and maintaining the center that benefited his community for more than 50 years.

    More about Howard and the Center's advocacy: https://eastriverparkaction.org/2025/04/16/support-howard-brandstein/

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Coming from the outside, this is what I don't understand. There's a big difference between how you handle someone who's been credibly accused of abuse or fraud and someone who...disagrees with the board about future directions for an organization. If the board has some serious claims of misconduct, they should make them public. Otherwise this just looks wildly disproportionate and casts doubt on their motives.

      Delete
  2. With all the crap news lately we did not need this. Anyway, for what it's worth, please sign the petition:

    "Reinstate Howard Brandstein as Executive Director of the Sixth Street Community Center"

    https://www.change.org/p/reinstate-howard-brandstein-as-executive-director-of-the-sixth-street-community-center?recruiter=1139079&recruited_by_id=5b8b3790-c1ae-012f-98cc-4040d2fbfbbf&utm_source=share_petition&utm_campaign=psf_combo_share_initial&utm_term=psf&utm_medium=copylink&utm_content=cl_sharecopy_490518940_en-US%3A7

    ReplyDelete
  3. Sounds like a classic case of founders syndrome, where a charismatic founder dominates an org well past the time they should have left it and/or delegate authority within it, nor set it up for a smooth transition into the next generation of the orgs leaders. This is so common in nonprofits the term is in Wiki.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Knowing exactly zero about this particular group I thought I would opine and that I'm inclined to agree with you about founders syndrome. That said, the board looks and sounds like a bunch of unsavory types and certainly their behavior is not exemplary and should not be modeled.

      Delete
  4. Sounds like someone has a bad case of TDS when they invoke using "Trump/ Musk tactics" as a way to demonize another party whom I assume is as progressive as it gets. Not to mention "name calling" (Oh my!) which I believe is now a capital offense which is punishable by deportation to El Salvador.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Wow: solid example of unbiased journalism that shows both sides without engaging in "both sides-ism" - in such rare supply these days. Awfully well done; I leave the article not quite knowing right from wrong, yet more informed altogether.

    ReplyDelete

Your remarks and lively debates are welcome, whether supportive or critical of the views herein. Your articulate, well-informed remarks that are relevant to an article are welcome.

However, commentary that is intended to "flame" or attack, that contains violence, racist comments and potential libel will not be published. Facts are helpful.

If you'd like to make personal attacks and libelous claims against people and businesses, then you may do so on your own social media accounts. Also, comments predicting when a new business will close ("I give it six weeks") will not be approved.