Sunday, March 1, 2026

Articles to read: The man who bet on St. Mark’s (in 1959)

The New York Times via writer Alessandra Schade takes a deep dive into Charles FitzGerald, the longtime St. Mark's Place landlord credited with helping shape the block's countercultural identity. 

FitzGerald arrived in 1959, when St. Mark's between Second and Third Avenue was largely boarded up and dirt cheap. What began as a $28-a-month studio-and-storefront deal turned into a decades-long experiment in retail, risk-taking and reinvention. 

He opened Bowl & Board in 1961, followed by a string of eclectic shops — from crushed velvet and vintage Levi's to imported goods and raccoon coats — eventually assembling multiple buildings and seven storefronts along the block. 

Over the years, as the street evolved from an immigrant enclave to a bohemian hub to a global curiosity, FitzGerald focused less on profit and more on "vibe," often subsidizing tenants he believed added to the character of St. Mark's. 

Tenants say he acts more like a curator than a conventional landlord. During the pandemic, he paused rent for some commercial tenants to help them survive. He also planted the oak trees that now line the block (the first in 1974), donated $2 million from building sales to a Maine conservancy and most recently backed Village Works, the late-night bookstore devoted to New York culture. 

Now 91, FitzGerald says he's not sentimental about the street’s changes — from the Gap's arrival in 1988 to the coming Sephora — viewing St. Mark's instead as "an evolving thing." 

Read the article here.

1 comment:

  1. A landlord who is truly part of the community. Bravo Mr. FitzGerald! Loved Bowl and Board. I recall the first time I walked down St. Marks in the 70s. It was different, vibrant and I knew the neighborhood was exactly where I wanted to be. So glad to have experienced it back then.

    ReplyDelete

Your remarks and lively debates are welcome, whether supportive or critical of the views herein. Your articulate, well-informed remarks that are relevant to an article are welcome.

However, commentary that is intended to "flame" or attack, that contains violence, racist comments and potential libel will not be published. Facts are helpful.

If you'd like to make personal attacks and libelous claims against people and businesses, then you may do so on your own social media accounts. Also, comments predicting when a new business will close ("I give it six weeks") will not be approved.