Wednesday, July 1, 2009

Yes, yes and yes

Susan Dominus on the mallification of Times Square in the Times today:

But right now, the pedestrian mall, it must be said, looks a little unworthy of New York.

And!

Or maybe the problem is not the quality of the seats. Maybe the problem is all the people sitting in them. New York is a city of walkers, not sitters; a city of motion, not repose.

And!

Sitting beside Ms. Mia, I was starting to rethink my impression of the pedestrian mall, appreciating some of its merits, messy though they may be. But only for a minute.

“I just really like it here,” she said. “I find it strangely peaceful.”

We’ve come to accept the multitudes of adjectives that rotate in and out of use for Times Square depending on the era: gritty, dangerous, commercial, touristy, kitschy, overpriced, overcrowded, flashy, tacky, corporate. But peaceful?

That’s just wrong.

2 comments:

  1. I'm told that technically, closing off that section of Broadway and channelling cars down 7th Avenue actually improves the flow of traffic, because the Broadway - 7th Avenue -42nd Street intersection is so awkward. I have no idea this is the case.

    But you can do that without the lawn chairs.

    Are we turning into 18th century Venice? The main city industries are now real estate, tourism, and borrowing lots of money and getting other people to pay it back. People now come here to be here, not to do something. But I think New York is too large and crowded to do a good imiation of a tourist city living off the history of when it mattered.

    In a sense, this doesn't change Times Square much people the foot traffic there has been so slow in recent years you might as well be sitting down in a lounge chair. All these people just strolling around around are infuriating for those of us who actually have places we have to get to.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Yeah, in a practical sense I have found that that area is much easier to walk through than it used to be.

    ReplyDelete

Your remarks and lively debates are welcome, whether supportive or critical of the views herein. Your articulate, well-informed remarks that are relevant to an article are welcome.

However, commentary that is intended to "flame" or attack, that contains violence, racist comments and potential libel will not be published. Facts are helpful.

If you'd like to make personal attacks and libelous claims against people and businesses, then you may do so on your own social media accounts. Also, comments predicting when a new business will close ("I give it six weeks") will not be approved.