Thursday, May 9, 2013

Workers remove tree that survived 51 Astor Place construction

Along Third Avenue between East Ninth Street and Astor Place, one tree remain throughout construction of 51 Astor Place... Having survived all that, a worker was spotted yesterday...




[Stephen Popkin]

...removing the tree...



Previously on EV Grieve:
Workers chopping down trees at 51 Astor Place

20 comments:

  1. God forbid there is a tree near this monstrosity. What a shame to lose a perfectly healthy tree.

    ReplyDelete
  2. ...perhaps they can build a luxury condo on the spot where the tree stood. just a little one.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Why? Seriously, why on earth?

    ReplyDelete
  4. These people are soulless.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Is that even legal?

    ReplyDelete
  6. That's a pretty remarkable thing considering that if a tree is even damaged in anyway during construction it's a $10,ooo. fine min. not to mention that if one removes a tree the cost is calculated on the trees growth at the time of removal.

    As taxpayers and residents are we eligable to know what the compensation is to the city and our neighborhood is for such removal?

    ReplyDelete
  7. Fucking assholes. Who cuts down a g-d damned tree in Manhattan?

    ReplyDelete
  8. Just gratuitously awful. It's as if someone said to himself "I haven't been enough of a dick today. What scummy thing can I do that will put me over the top?"

    ReplyDelete
  9. It's illegal to remove a tree without the legal permission by the City, specifically the Dept of Parks, and the plan to replant at the same or more acreage of that which was removed. i.e. Macombs Dam Park for Yankee Stadium.

    ReplyDelete
  10. THE NOTORIOUS L.I.B.E.R.A.T.I.O.N.May 9, 2013 at 7:07 PM

    No respect for old buildings OR old trees.

    ReplyDelete
  11. "Everything that has transpired has done so according to my design."

    ReplyDelete
  12. Why were they allowed to murder this beautiful air freshening and healthy tree? In which circle of hell of Dante's inferno were the suicides who became suffering trees for eternity? This is the punishment these cretins deserve! As a taxpayer and resident, I am truly outraged and sickened.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Infect 41 Astor Place with thousands of Asian longhorn beetles and call Parks to cut it down and reduce it to a heap of broken glass.

    ReplyDelete
  14. They're replacing the sidewalks around the building - along it's northern edge, the first to be replaced, they've sunk plots for new trees to be planted. I expect they'll do the same for the other sides. It's also worth pointing out that they've already planted about 6 new trees in the plaza they're building.

    ReplyDelete
  15. you EV grievers are such babies. they are planting new trees you jabronis

    ReplyDelete
  16. Yes yes yes, we've all seen the concept art, we know there are new trees coming in. But after a perfectly good tree survived the demolition of the old building and the entire construction process of the new building, to take this hardy survivor and kill it simply because it didn't fit in with someone's preplanned layout just seems gratuitous.

    Of course it's anthropomorphizing. But those of us who've lived here for a long time can't help but project ourselves onto a tree like that: something that survived all the upheavals of the past several decades but is now considered an unnecessary nuisance with no place in the real estate developers' East Village of the future.

    ReplyDelete
  17. wow... how incredibly stupid to do this AFTER everything it went thru and survived. Its analogous to having survived a car accident, recovering and then being shot during a mugging.
    .
    It might as well been chopped when the demolition began, its probably is Cooper Union's FUCK YOU to the community.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Death Star = Bunch of pussies.

    ReplyDelete
  19. IT WAS REMOVED BY THE NYC PARKS DEPARTMENT, NOT THE DEVELOPER.

    ReplyDelete

Your remarks and lively debates are welcome, whether supportive or critical of the views herein. Your articulate, well-informed remarks that are relevant to an article are welcome.

However, commentary that is intended to "flame" or attack, that contains violence, racist comments and potential libel will not be published. Facts are helpful.

If you'd like to make personal attacks and libelous claims against people and businesses, then you may do so on your own social media accounts. Also, comments predicting when a new business will close ("I give it six weeks") will not be approved.