




Can we get that overhead seesaw thing back?
And head on over to the Museum's website for more photos... they are available for purchase as well as gawking...
Your remarks and lively debates are welcome, whether supportive or critical of the views herein. Your articulate, well-informed remarks that are relevant to an article are welcome.
However, commentary that is intended to "flame" or attack, that contains violence, racist comments and potential libel will not be published. Facts are helpful.
If you'd like to make personal attacks and libelous claims against people and businesses, then you may do so on your own social media accounts. Also, comments predicting when a new business will close ("I give it six weeks") will not be approved.
Grieve,
ReplyDeleteThese are great. They go a long way in dispelling the false notion that this area was always a haven for fringe elements.
Not one rat or heroin needle in the picture....
ReplyDeleteWow. These are really incredible images when you consider that they were taken in April 1904 and just a few months later in June 1904 the General Slocum disaster killed a thousand children and women -- most of whom lived near Tompkins Square Park and very likely appear in these photographs.
ReplyDeleteGreat photos. I love that the baby is left to play in the dirt. Ahh, the good old days before the Purell mentality.
ReplyDeleteWhen I was a kid in the 1950s St George School would drag us our for a stupid procession in Tompkins Square Park, I never understood why we were marching. Looks like those girls in another era and decade are as befuddled as I was, too! Same dumb education practices, it never ends.
ReplyDeleteVery cool! Thanks for posting.
ReplyDeleteHaving just returned from an early morning walk through TSP, can appreciate these even more!
ReplyDeleteDoesn't Anonymous 8:40's comment violate the Comments Policy? "...commentary that is intended to "flame" or attack..."
ReplyDelete@ anon 10:03
ReplyDeleteYes. I missed the last line. Here's the comment without it.
Anonymous said...
SMDH nobody has claimed the park "area was always a haven for fringe elements."
Once again... you take the sentiments of what's written in comments, hear what you want, interpret as you choose, and regurgitate words that you put in the mouths of others for no other reason to instigate.
almost hate to say it, but the park looks kinda cool without all the trees.
ReplyDeleteand shawn's comment is probably most important - many of these kids pictured probably never reached their teens.
Wow, look how much more open and parky it looked without those heavy steel fences. Does anybody know when those went up?
ReplyDeletebaby trees!
ReplyDeleteI would hazard a guess all these children died a few months later. 1,400 people mostly women and children. Most of them were slotted to attend the newly built PS 64 (9th and B)the next fall. Twas the end of Kleindeutschland and the beginning of a new neighborhood. .
ReplyDeleteThe denizens of the park certainly look more dignified and appealing in these old photos than in the present-day park.
ReplyDelete- East Villager
You got that right, East Villager, Americans nowadays are slobs. Its interesting to me to see pictures of contemporary alleged poverty stricken collapsing North Koreans running around in flip flops and then I see all the USians wearing the same things, except of course the USians have to put glitter and sequins on theirs to doll them up and show off their fucking individuality.
ReplyDeleteHey.....that fella in the last pic wears his hat the same way you do EVG.....rakish tilt'n'all.
ReplyDeleteWhere are all the crusties?
ReplyDelete...this morning all I could think was... wish there were a way to get the seemingly dozens of people who looked down, homeless, hungry some sustained help! At no point did I wonder why they weren't rocking Varvatos.
ReplyDelete