Friday, October 3, 2014

East Village now down a dorm

Renovations continue at 101 E. 10th St., the former SVA dorm at the corner of Third Avenue.

The 5-story building that houses a TD bank hit the market back in the spring. However, it appears that real-estate investment firm Atkins & Breskin still retains the property.

Regardless, the job site has a partial approval from the DOB, which notes a "gut rehabilitation of existing apartment building and change in the number of dwelling units. Obtain amended [Certificate of Occupancy]." So we're looking at a conversion to residential.

The Real Deal originally reported in March that "an additional 7,802 square feet of as-of-right air rights" existed for the building. There's nothing yet on file with the DOB to note any extra floors.

SVA students reportedly left the dorm after the spring term. A school official told The Villager that the school would use a new residence on East 24th Street at First Avenue.


  1. The Grumpy Grievers are going to be really confused as to how to feel about this one:

    Less dorms and students - YAY!
    More luxury housing - BOO!

    Who's going to lead the protest and demand that the real estate company convert this to free shelter for the homeless?

  2. I do not love dorms. But we should also note that NYU students report a shortage of dorm space downtown. My understanding is that a shared dorm room rate is about $2,000 per head per month. So, private landlords price many of their cramped 2 BR apts in the EV and WV for just under that rate, like $3,900, as an example. Not great apts, either.

  3. Today's nyu student, is tomorrow's ev transplant hipster. So it makes no difference really. The owner can get more money from a renter than a student. Therein lies the rub

  4. There is a shortage of dorm space because they keep admitting more and more students without having a plan on how to house them.


Your remarks and lively debates are welcome, whether supportive or critical of the views herein. Your articulate, well-informed remarks that are relevant to an article are welcome.

However, commentary that is intended to "flame" or attack, that contains violence, racist comments and potential libel will not be published. Facts are helpful.

If you'd like to make personal attacks and libelous claims against people and businesses, then you may do so on your own social media accounts. Also, comments predicting when a new business will close ("I give it six weeks") will not be approved.