Thursday, March 26, 2015

'A very long night'


[Photo this afternoon by James & Karla Murray]

Coverage from Gothamist:

FDNY Commissioner Daniel Nigro said the call about the explosion came in at 3:17 p.m., and the FDNY had a three minute response time. "They were not expecting this scene," he said. "The first 15 minutes [firefighters] made extremely dangerous searches of these buildings." He said that 119 is a fully-involved fire, and still in danger of possible collapse.

"We will be here for a very long night," Nigro added.

8 comments:

  1. It doesn't look good for the workers or company that was doing the work. There's been no reporting on their whereabouts . . .

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thanks for all the updates. This fine EV grieve blog is the first place I check for local news.

    ReplyDelete
  3. The interesting thing is that when you look on the Dept. of Buildings website there were no permits pulled at any of these buildings for "gas" work.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Initial reports said that workers were doing work on gas pipes, and they had left the building around 12:30-1 PM, and people smelled gas after that. fwiw.

    ReplyDelete
  5. The gas was not turned on according to Con Edison ..March 26, 2015 at 8:19 PM

    According to a Con Ed's president (via DNAinfo.com):

    "Con Edison inspectors were at the building at 2 p.m. Thursday to check on a meter installation, the utility's president Craig Ivey said during the press conference. The unit did not pass inspection and gas was not turned on to the meter, he said."

    So if the gas was not turned on, where did it come from?

    ReplyDelete
  6. Daily News is reporting this Gas leak blast in NYC's East Village: 2 in critical condition, a dozen others hurt as blaze tears through sushi restaurant, causes building to collapse; Con Ed inspectors gave owner of building failing grade on gas pipe installation
    So for those who always take the owners side on anything looks like they were warned by Con Ed.

    ReplyDelete
  7. This is horrible. It was basically caused by the hands of someone else, while unintentional, it still caused havoc and turmoil. Those who are responsible should come forward. Immediately.

    ReplyDelete
  8. The responsibility ultimately lies with Con Ed. If something didn't pass inspection and had to do with a "main" going into the building, Con Ed should have shut off service to the individual building "at the street", which they definitely can do, and then there's no gas going into any part of the building.

    ReplyDelete

Your remarks and lively debates are welcome, whether supportive or critical of the views herein. Your articulate, well-informed remarks that are relevant to an article are welcome.

However, commentary that is intended to "flame" or attack, that contains violence, racist comments and potential libel will not be published. Facts are helpful.

If you'd like to make personal attacks and libelous claims against people and businesses, then you may do so on your own social media accounts. Also, comments predicting when a new business will close ("I give it six weeks") will not be approved.