Saturday, July 20, 2024

Saturday's opening shot

Someone tagged a window at the new office building going up at 1-3 St Mark's Place at Third Avenue. Somone also called 911 to report it last night, per the Citizen app.

22 comments:

  1. Ugh. All neighborhoods are not like this. Carlina needs to come up with a plan with the NYPD to get this under control. This is not art.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. What about all the illegal flyposting adverts done by big brands that are an even more prolific blight? Oh yeah, that's all about money, so NYPD or the mayor aren't going to upset the businesses that pay into the political lobbying/influence/corruption fund.
      Plus, Saint Mark is obviously the patron saint of tagging

      Delete
  2. Big deal. Did this really merit a 911 call?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It says "1-3 Saint Mark's Place", so he was just following instructions lol

      Delete
  3. Why doesn’t the headline say “Vandalized” instead of “Tagged”?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. When it's buffed off it will be renamed Ain't Marks Place

      Delete
  4. WTF is wrong with people? This is just wrong. Vandalism is a crime. Accountability should follow for the perpetrators who did this.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. building this hideous structures is a crime

      Delete
  5. Anon 10:07. Because that form and action of graffiti is tagging. Tags used to be relatively small, often in unexpected places and you would not cover big graffiti pieces.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yeah, I get it. Not like “tagging” is some hip new phrase. The point is, defacing someone else’s property is still
      Vandalism. I miss the old,
      Pre-corporate EV as much as anyone. I resent the big money intrusion as well. I walked past the Ringo Mural on St. Mark’s every day, on my way to pick up
      Some inexpensive takeout pierogi from Leshko’s or the Kiev to my firetrap sublet across from TS Park. Years Before the Death Star and the NYU Lego Dorms. I remember chatting with Paul as he was owning Paul’s Place, and taking dates out for Indian Food on Sixth Street.
      place. But that still doesn’t mean I have a right to inflict costly damage on somebody else’s property. And I think EVGrieve,
      One of my go-to daily destinations, can do better than to give such vandals the attention they crave.

      Delete
  6. Anyone want to talk about how the building itself is much more of an eyesore and offense to the aesthetics of the neighborhood than any tag?

    ReplyDelete
  7. oh so now everyone likes the new building? just yesterday we were bemoaning it's very existence....

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I too, resent the big ugly presence of these buildings without character and dearly miss the EV’s mostly 6-story skyline (plus steeples). There are
      Many things in this world that I
      Would rather not have to look at, while pondering the social forces and changes they represent. And I have admired unique, clever, and skillfully executed , unauthorized “public art” over the decades. But that doesn’t mean that I can condone the defacing of other people’s property at significant cost, Especially when the artist exhibits little more talent than a preschooler who scrawls their name on the classroom wall with a fat crayon for attention, or to vent an inner rage that they are not yet old enough to articulate.

      Delete
  8. The crime is the building itself. And others of its ilk. Pearl-clutching, 911-dialers should be prosecuted for misusing emergency resources.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This must be
      the tenth time this week that I’ve seen someone refer to the clutching of pearls. How about coming up with your own, updated take on what you are trying to describe?

      Delete
  9. I don't expect the building's owners to be happy about the tag but 911? Can everyone who hates being here just move to Westchester or whatever now?

    ReplyDelete
  10. @7:18pm: So you're in FAVOR of vandalism? Why do you think you can tell me and everyone else in this neighborhood that we must "hate being here" simply b/c we'd like to live in a semi-decent society?

    I think *you* should move! Preferably to an edgier neighborhood where tagging is EVERYWHERE; somewhere in the Bronx or Brooklyn perhaps. Because YOU are the odd person out in this discussion.

    I sure as hell would call 911 if I saw that happening. And I'd be likely to grab my camera or cell phone to try to get a clear image of the cretin involved to share with the NYPD.

    ReplyDelete
  11. There’s so much ugly vandalism on buildings in the EV. It’s a disgusting display of identity crisis by self-deluded wanna pre artists.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Graffiti = Vandalism
    Simple as that.

    Stop trying to rationalize infantile, narcissistic, destructive, illegal, criminal behavior absolutely bereft of any redeeming social value - especially to those who have to experience their unintelligible, moronic scribblings everyday.

    If they were such "AR-TEASTS" they would be getting paid to paint murals, pieces, canvasses or what-ever. All they do is deface other people's properties and lives.

    Get a clue.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Vandalism used to be a crime! But we can't turn NYC into Disneyland, right?!

    ReplyDelete
  14. Somone is a really good neighbor...

    ReplyDelete
  15. I agree this is atrocious! Only one tag? The building should be covered!

    ReplyDelete

Your remarks and lively debates are welcome, whether supportive or critical of the views herein. Your articulate, well-informed remarks that are relevant to an article are welcome.

However, commentary that is intended to "flame" or attack, that contains violence, racist comments and potential libel will not be published. Facts are helpful.

If you'd like to make personal attacks and libelous claims against people and businesses, then you may do so on your own social media accounts. Also, comments predicting when a new business will close ("I give it six weeks") will not be approved.