Wednesday, August 14, 2024

A look at the ongoing renovations at First Houses

Photos and reporting by Stacie Joy 

We've fielded several queries about the extensive renovations at the city-owned First Houses on Avenue A between Second Street and Third Street, both in the residences and above the strip of retail spaces.
For starters, a little history of the eight four-story and five-story buildings with the residential entrances on the south side of Third Street between Avenue A and First Avenue. First Houses was the first publicly funded low-income housing project in the U.S., opening in December 1935 under the auspices of the just-created New York City Housing Authority (NYCHA). 

First Houses was originally planned to house 120 to 122 families, and all apartments had steam heat, hot water and were equipped with the modern amenities typically found in middle-class housing. Within two months of opening a rental office for the project, the Housing Authority received between 3,000 and 4,000 applications. Prospective tenants were carefully selected by a team of social workers, with preference given to the inhabitants of the worst slums and relatively small families. All but one of the families chosen were residents of the Lower East Side. 

First Houses became a NYC Landmark in 1974. 
In recent decades, the buildings have shown their age, revealing ongoing bureaucracy issues plaguing the NYCHA.

In 2011, City Limits documented many of the residents' issues here. There were stories of mice eating their way through the worn floorboards and a resident battling the NYCHA for 15 years over a persistent leak. 

Fast forward to the start of the renovations last year. According to an architect working on the $24.8-million roofing replacement and exterior restoration:
[The] project is for restorative work throughout all of the facades of buildings within the complex, including rebuilding brick parapets in kind, repointing masonry and replacing brickwork, precast coping stones and metal lintels. 

Entrance porticos will be temporarily removed to allow for the replacement or restoration of green-painted cast iron columns and railings. Work on porticos includes the replacement of portico copper roofs, copper cornices, new concrete entrance stairs, landings, and footings, and replacement of nearby concrete or asphalt pavers pathways. Roofs of all buildings will be replaced with new liquid-applied roofing membrane over new insulation. 
In addition, the construction site manager told us: "We are replacing the roof and doing masonry restoration. We've also started on the interior work, which includes drywalling and lead and asbestos removal." 

Here's a look around the complex earlier this summer...
As you may have noticed, many tenants have moved out, including the local folk hero known as The Chillmaster, known for blasting classic R&B from his open window (year-round).

Local Assemblymember Harvey Epstein told us that tenants were temporarily relocated to other complexes, including the Jacob Riis Houses and the Wald Houses, and some public housing further away from the Lower East Side. 

Epstein said that all tenants can return to the First Houses upon completion of the work, set for 2025, per the posted signage.

18 comments:

  1. Public housing should not be landmarked. New housing should be built that can use the space more efficiently and blend into the neighborhood

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Why shouldn't public housing be landmarked? Do not the working poor deserve the dignity of having their place in history acknowledged?

      Delete
    2. The working poor deserve more housing in an under utilized space in a prime location. Not a overpriced high maintenance building for nostalgic stakes

      Delete
  2. Where are the publicly funded low-income housing projects of today? Seems like current and recent past mayors think their Real Estate Industry cronies are going to solve the high housing costs crisis. Guess what? All they care about is profits. This is a riches City in the riches country in the world, and we are not housing our people. Something's wrong.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    2. We have 65,000 other guests who require housing instead.

      Delete
  3. Wow that plaque hasn’t been stolen.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That plaque is a goner for sure.

      Delete
  4. Its insane how much NYCHA spends on renovations. The private sector would complete these renovations at a fraction of the cost. I doubt that these costs include any interior lead abatement. City's worst landlord - re number of violations, compliance etc is NYCHA. Tenants deserve better.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The private sector would do it cheaper? who are you trying to kid?

      Delete
    2. Do it cheaper alright! By doing it with inferiors goods and cheap labor! For it to fall down in 5 years,if even that long.I see no savings when renovations have to be done all over again,because it was not done right! Do it right the first time.

      Delete
    3. 110% right the government cost per job versus free market is absurd . it stuffed full of padded contracts and graft

      Delete
  5. Hasn't been stolen ... yet.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Ahhh no wonder I haven't heard or seen the Chillmaster

    ReplyDelete
  7. The way the second street side of the building has been graffitied is a shame. I hope removing it is part of the project. However with the bridge now removed I am losing hope.

    ReplyDelete
  8. It's taking forever it's driving me crazy. Why are they so slow? And I don't need chillmaster, dude was inconsiderate as hell.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sadly, the completion of this work may be a double-edged sword for you as it means the return of the chillmaster.

      Delete
  9. Hmmm, nice plaque! Wonder how much it weighs and how it's attached to the building.

    ReplyDelete

Your remarks and lively debates are welcome, whether supportive or critical of the views herein. Your articulate, well-informed remarks that are relevant to an article are welcome.

However, commentary that is intended to "flame" or attack, that contains violence, racist comments and potential libel will not be published. Facts are helpful.

If you'd like to make personal attacks and libelous claims against people and businesses, then you may do so on your own social media accounts. Also, comments predicting when a new business will close ("I give it six weeks") will not be approved.