Friday, October 30, 2026

On 11th Street, residents and businesses say e-bike congestion needs a lasting solution

Photos and reporting by Stacie Joy

Residents and business owners gathered yesterday at the corner of 11th Street and First Avenue to urge the city to address ongoing e-bike congestion, blocked sidewalks, and sanitation concerns along the block. 

The press conference, themed "A Safer Corner for Everyone," was organized by the newly formed East Village Beautification Project, whose members say more than two years of complaints have failed to produce a lasting solution. 

Christine Renzi, a property owner on the block who founded the group about a month ago, said it already has more than 60 members.
"For more than two and a half years, we have been raising concerns about conditions on this block," Renzi said. "Residents and businesses have spoken up repeatedly, but we still do not have a real solution." 

She described sidewalks crowded with e-bikes, food waste, rats and difficulty accessing residential buildings and storefronts. 

She also questioned why so many delivery workers and their bikes have been concentrated on a single residential block. 

"Delivery workers deserve respect and appropriate places to gather," she said. "But this residential block is not an appropriate place for over 400 e-bikes and workers to gather unlawfully at all hours." 

Organizers cited the figure of 400 bikes, but it has not been independently verified. 

Renzi also criticized the lack of resident and business participation in discussions about the block's future, saying those most directly affected have not been invited to meetings with elected officials and delivery-worker representatives. 

"We need a win-win solution," she said. "We want to come up with an equitable solution for everybody." 

Several speakers described how conditions have affected their daily lives and businesses. Mike Paredes, the former owner of REVMPD, a consignment shop at 178 First Ave., a storefront south of the corner, said the congestion contributed to his decision to close the business in March.
Paredes, who now works as an MTA bus driver, said his store relied heavily on foot traffic and window displays to attract customers. As bikes and groups of people increasingly occupied the space outside, he said, that visibility suffered. 

"Owning the store was my dream," he said. "I'm here for the other businesses that are here, and I hope that they won't have to share the same story." 

Robert Zerilli, co-owner of East Village Institution Veniero's Pasticceria and Caffè at 342 E. 11th St. on the next block, said the problems extend beyond any one storefront.

"Small businesses depend on people walking through the neighborhood, looking through the windows, meeting a friend, coming for coffee, or something to eat," he said.
Zerilli said he knew of at least six businesses that had closed near the corner in the past two years, though he emphasized that he was not attributing those closures solely to e-bike congestion.

"This isn't about demonizing anyone. It's about balance," he said. "People need to work. Residents need to get around. Storefront businesses need to remain accessible." 

For Izabela Padula, who has lived on the block for nearly four years, navigating the sidewalk with her baby and stroller has become a daily challenge.
"When I leave home with my baby, I should be able to push a stroller down the sidewalk," she said, calling on the city to maintain clear pedestrian access. 

Longtime residents Beth Graves and Michael Anton also spoke about deteriorating sanitation conditions. Graves, who has lived in the neighborhood since 1974, said she sometimes struggles to get through the block while walking her dog to Tompkins Square Park. 

She also expressed concerns about discarded food and an increase in rats. Anton, a resident since 1981, directed some of his criticism toward the delivery-app companies themselves. He compared the difficult working conditions faced by delivery workers to those experienced by his immigrant grandparents in sweatshops. 

"DoorDash, Seamless, Uber Eats. You have made so much money," he said. "Do something for the people who have made that possible." 

Anton suggested the companies help provide off-street parking and gathering spaces for delivery workers rather than leaving the burden on residential blocks. 

Meanwhile, the block saw a cleanup effort yesterday afternoon. According to NYPD sources familiar with the operation, police worked with delivery workers to identify abandoned and derelict bikes.

The Department of Sanitation discarded and removed a dozen bikes. Police took two additional bikes obstructing the sidewalk to the 9th Precinct and vouchered them. Police said the bikes were turned over voluntarily. [Photo below by Jim Naureckas]
The cleanup followed continued NYPD attention to the block, though residents at the press conference questioned whether the improvements would last. 

"The NYPD was here yesterday and today, and we appreciate that," Renzi said. "But two days of attention are not a substitute for daily enforcement." 

Organizers are calling for coordinated action by the NYPD, Department of Sanitation, other city agencies and elected officials to keep sidewalks and building entrances accessible, address sanitation and develop a longer-term plan for delivery-bike parking.
Their message was that the city needs to find a solution that accommodates delivery workers without leaving residents and small businesses to contend with the same conditions day after day.
Previously on EV Grieve: 


15 comments:

  1. lived on 11th and 1st for 26 years. every delivery app needs to be mandated to maintain a certain amount of storefronts outfitted for their employees to rest, eat, clean up, and store their bikes. it should be commensurate with the number of restaurants per zip code that offer delivery through the apps. these companies make profit hand over fist with little regulation, while exploiting workers and creating technologically indentured servitude. give them some dignity as employees, not just faceless gig workers, you already dont give them health insurance or paid leave or anything else normal employees get in this country. and they do a job many people wont do and clearly there is a demand for.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I think what they’re saying is entirely reasonable and I appreciate them banding together to tell their story and push for change in a civil, thoughtful way. This is exactly what we should want to people to do and I hope it gets the sustained response it deserves. That block is on my east-to-west bike route and the area is a total mess. The city should find a place to accommodate delivery workers, but not prioritize them over the residents and business owners. For example, there are spaces under and around the Manhattan ends of the East River bridges that are not far from subway lines and could be repurposed for bike storage. Look around the 7th Precinct HQ just south of the Williamsburg Bridge, and Police Plaza by the Brooklyn Bridge. City government needs to take responsibility here.

    ReplyDelete
  3. We been calling this out for years but been labeled as "racists" for wanting those bikes out. Has nothing to do with racism, it's pure about being clean and safe. Stop being so soft on this

    ReplyDelete
  4. The lasting solution is called enforcing the law. E-bikes are dangerous and need to be treated as moto vehicles. Something going 20 mph in a bike lane is not a bike plus having no insurance.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Just more proof again the City doesn't do shit unless a group of people get organized and open their face holes. Bike storage is the immediate problem but bike delivery and hanging out on the street is not exactly a long term career. Are they learning new skills? What's their plan moving forward?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Agreed, NYC government is reactive not proactive. Usually they react after something extreme occurs until then it’s a free for all.

      Delete
  6. There is a large open space on E. 13th Street, I think between 1st and 2nd Avenue. Could they move to that location?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. They have picked up that specific corner for its proximity to the mosque.

      Delete
  7. My family does not get food delivery. We cook at home. If we get take out we walk or take bus.

    Ironically the biggest users of food delivery are young healthy - and wealthy.
    Our neighbor age 33 gets food delivery almost every day.

    Food delivery is not an “entitlement “.

    The evil corporations like DoorDash should be providing and paying for space.

    Not ok for public space to be used for food delivery.
    Not ok for food delivery to be prioritized over everything and everyone else.

    ReplyDelete
  8. This block is such a vivid reminder of just how useless and cowardly the city government has become. All you have to do is rattle off a few "ists" (racist, classist etc) and reason flies right out the window. These bikes should have been forcibly removed when they numbered in the Tens. It is RIDICULOUS residents have to tip toe around the feelings of people (both the app companies and drivers) who obviously couldn't care less about our neighborhood. It's up to the delivery drivers and the apps that exploit them to find a solution. If they can't, fine them and seize the bikes. They'll work it out very quickly, trust me. Here's a solution we in the EV could follow. Stop ordering off these crappy apps. Walk or ride a bike to get your food and get a little exercise. Stop supporting these exploitation businesses who overcharge us and pay their labor peanuts.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. AMEN and NAIL ON THE HEAD. It's such a visible and ugly failure of the most basic city governance. Instead of pontificating and grandstanding on global issues, how about cleaning up a disaster sidewalk that's been screamed about FOR TWO YEARS?

      One idea for EV citizens and neighbors to positively take matters into our own hands: start a movement called WILL WALK FOR FOOD. And ask local EV/LES restaurants if they'd be willing to participate.

      The idea would be to create some kind of minor incentive (like a simple punch card) that gets marked or punched when you WALK to pick up your own food. After a predetermined number of WILL WALK FOR FOOD visits, you'd get, say, a discount on your 5th pick-up meal, or a free appetizer or desert (or whatever).

      You'd think that all the fees that are added to a burrito or shawarma wrap ordered via delivery app would be incentive enough. But apparently not. We should be encouraging folks to get the eff off their phones and asses, walk a couple of blocks to pick up their own food, and engage with neighborhood business and the people who work there. WALK. FOR. FOOD.

      Delete
  9. We took a couple of pictures of the cluster during a record high day, and a couple of guys were taunting us, saying to take their pictures because they are not afraid from anyone. I wonder why aren't they afraid from anyone, especially someone specific.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Finally people are realizing that our elected pols are working for the party not the people. E. 11th street has turned into a long term parking lot for e-bikes. When I walk by there are generally 5 to 10 guys hanging around. But there are a 100 bikes. Where are the other 90 riders? If the riders that were actively working parked there... fine... But to leave bikes there because the owner isn't working anymore or has taken time off is the problem. If the city issued an order of removal by a certain date... they would be removed or put in storage and the area would be cleaned up for the neighborhood and the drivers.

    ReplyDelete
  11. "The East Village Beautification Project" is being absurdly melodramatic. The sidewalks are clear; they held their own press conference on the open pavement right next to the e-bikes. This isn't about safety; it's about residents who want the convenience of delivery apps without having to look at the people doing the work. Delivery drivers have organically built a third space outside a mosque, and the people who keep the city running shouldn't be swept out of sight to protect someone's aesthetic.

    ReplyDelete

Your remarks and lively debates are welcome, whether supportive or critical of the views herein. Your articulate, well-informed remarks that are relevant to an article are welcome.

However, commentary that is intended to "flame" or attack, that contains violence, racist comments and potential libel will not be published. Facts are helpful.

If you'd like to make personal attacks and libelous claims against people and businesses, then you may do so on your own social media accounts. Also, comments predicting when a new business will close ("I give it six weeks") will not be approved.