Friday, May 25, 2012

Shocking revelations: People like looking at photos of topless women on the Internet

Last Friday, we posted the item about the topless advocate who was walking around the neighborhood topless. (This post.)

Since then, we've received quite a few more photos (which we never posted) of the women, first identified by Racked as Moira Johnston.

Anyway, our post quickly became the most-viewed, uh, post in EV Grieve's five-year history, easily topping the former No. 1 — The East Village rolls out welcome wagon for new Starbucks.

Which begs the question: Will you start posting more photos of topless women?

Yes. And we will also include some peen for equal time.

Actually, that wasn't the question.

This is: What was the least-viewed EV Grieve post of all time?

Oh! So many to choose from.

Blogger doesn't keep track of such things. But if we had to guess. It was this one from July 9, 2008...


Per the post:

Drug store celebrity exit wars
Duade Reade has Mario Lopez gracing its exits (and disguising the store's security system). Not to be outdone, Rite Aid (at least the one on 14th Street between Avenues A and B) wants us to smell like David Beckham.


According to Google Analytics, no one even casually glimpsed at this post.

7 comments:

  1. The Becks photo was too much for my heart to handle, so not only did I not click on it, I put some masking tape on my computer screen to avoid glancing into his dreamy eyes.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Ah, thank you for the explanation. That makes me feel better... It's also probably time to resume compiling such hard-hitting news items as celebrity cologne ads at Rite Aid!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Wait, there are photos of topless girls on the internet?!? Im going to have to look into this further...

    ReplyDelete
  4. @Googla -
    I try that every weekend, and it doesnt seem to work, all I have to show for it is a stack of restraining orders...

    ReplyDelete

Your remarks and lively debates are welcome, whether supportive or critical of the views herein. Your articulate, well-informed remarks that are relevant to an article are welcome.

However, commentary that is intended to "flame" or attack, that contains violence, racist comments and potential libel will not be published. Facts are helpful.

If you'd like to make personal attacks and libelous claims against people and businesses, then you may do so on your own social media accounts. Also, comments predicting when a new business will close ("I give it six weeks") will not be approved.