Wednesday, March 6, 2013

Report: THE EAST VILLAGE IS REALLY NOISY!

So, amNY analyzed 311 data and found that! The East Village is the noisiest neighborhood in the City.

Woo! High-fives everyone!

Oh.

According to the paper's not-really-surprising analysis, the East Village (2,108 noise complaints), the Lower East Side (2,069) and Williamsburg (2,061) are the city's top three offenders.

Local leaders responded:

Susan Stetzer, district manager of Community Board 3, which oversees the East Village, said the area has had the most complaints "for many years" and that it's "nothing new."

How will you celebrate this hard-earned victory?

[St. Patrick's Day 2012 via Bobby Williams]

18 comments:

  1. nothing new, but CB3 will still approve places like the DL and EMM on the bowery.

    ReplyDelete
  2. At least the junkies were quiet.

    ReplyDelete
  3. what did you say? i can't hear you above the noise!

    I-)

    ReplyDelete
  4. THE NOTORIOUS L.I.B.E.R.A.T.I.O.N.March 6, 2013 at 10:40 AM

    Susan Stetzer should be forced to live on AA Row - AKA the 13th Step / Professor Thom's block - then let's see how nonchalant she is. Maybe then she'd take this seriously.

    The East Village has NEVER been this bad with regards to bars, drinking and public displays of alcoholism, except maybe in the 1800s when we didn't have laws and community boards.

    ReplyDelete
  5. In other community new: I had a very productive Monday afternoon. I watched the Wacky Wok flyer guy spend five minutes trying to figure out how to tape a flyer on the Theater for the New City's board. I then caught the 4th Street dog owner who doesn't EVER clean up after his dog. And it is a neighborhood regular, ugh.

    ReplyDelete
  6. By hanging Susan Stetzer in effigy?

    ReplyDelete
  7. Is it the noisiest or the place where people complain the most?

    Scientific Data!

    ReplyDelete
  8. I'm not sure why anyone blames Susan Stetzer. The noise comes from the bars. The bars get approved by CB3's SLA committee. Stetzer is not on that committee. But other bar owners are.

    More bars in the area make for a nightlife district, which these committee members love. That way, it increases the value of their establishments, so they can sell them for a greater profit.

    Until more local residents get on the CB3/SLA committee, and say NO to the bar applications, we have no one to blame but ourselves.

    ReplyDelete
  9. St. Marks Place might as well be Crescent Street or Bourbon Street. The playground in TSP is more my speed these days.

    ReplyDelete
  10. EV! EV! I'M NOT READING YOU! DO YOU COPY OVER?

    ReplyDelete
  11. ...and which area is the most quiet?

    not that i'm going to leave my beloved East Village...

    ReplyDelete
  12. @bowery boy - the reality is, it does not matter what the SLA committee says, be it yea or nay. It's the state SLA that has final jurisdiction, and they rubber-stamp everything for approval because their only concern, which has been the case for years, is getting the money for the licenses. The SLA commissioners all live upstate and are not impacted by their decisions to turn NYC into Nightlife Central, so they don't care about the fallout from too many bars and drunks.

    ReplyDelete
  13. I wonder how many of the 311 calls were related to construction noise.

    ReplyDelete
  14. The woo-ing has gotten out of control in the past few year. It used to be an occasional frat party that moved to a rooftop projecting mainstream rap upwards and outwards but the noise now is drunks (as many women as men) screaming like idiots to show how awesome a time they are having just before they hurl.

    ReplyDelete
  15. I don't know why people blame Susan. She does have a vote in anything that comes before CB3. If you want to change CB3 then volunteer to join them so you can change things. CB3's recommendations are only advisory but if there are valid legal grounds to deny then the SLA will sometimes listen. Lot's of people opposing certainly helps but you need to catch a place lying on their application or bring up past violations for places they have owned.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Mr Grieve, I remember some time ago you had a piece on Police Summonses for things like disorderly conduct, public drunkeness, etc...And how the number of summonses issued paled in comparison to other neighborhoods. You were on to something there...I know its the bars responsibility to maintain their customers, but how about MORE action from police? The onus of all these noise issues has fallen on the bars, and rightfully so, but should they have to police the noise on streets by themselves? How about increasing the number of summonses for disorderly conduct to NYU yahoos from Nebraska, and maybe word gets around dorms, and maybe morons will start acting better...

    ReplyDelete
  17. The East Village has always been noisy. What's new is the abundance of nancies who complain about such things.

    ReplyDelete
  18. I was not saying that I think the noise is ok--i am the one that tries to deal with the complaints--I was simply telling the reporter that this was not a new story and I didn't have time to speak to him. (I was too busy trying to deal with complaints) The Community Board District Needs statement every year reports that we have more commerical noise complaints than any other board. I don't have time to respond to every baby reporter who rediscovers this. Commercial noise complaints is bar noise--not construction noise or any other noise complaints. Susan stetzer

    ReplyDelete

Your remarks and lively debates are welcome, whether supportive or critical of the views herein. Your articulate, well-informed remarks that are relevant to an article are welcome.

However, commentary that is intended to "flame" or attack, that contains violence, racist comments and potential libel will not be published. Facts are helpful.

If you'd like to make personal attacks and libelous claims against people and businesses, then you may do so on your own social media accounts. Also, comments predicting when a new business will close ("I give it six weeks") will not be approved.