Thursday, August 1, 2013

The incredible plan to build 'Space Invader-esque residential towers' by the Williamsburg Bridge



A reader shares a link to a Wired article titled "Maps of Unrealized City Plans Reveal What Might Have Been."

The piece looks at city plans that (thankfully, in some cases) never came to be... all via Andrew Lynch's Tumblr called Hyperreal Cartography & The Unrealized City ... it's loaded with city maps "collected from libraries, municipal archives, and dark corners of the Internet."

Of some local interest... the above plans from the 1950s-1960s ... it was an idea hatched after Robert Moses didn't get his Lower Manhattan Expressway off the ground...

"[T]he Ford Foundation asked architect Paul Rudolph to envision an urban expressway that was better integrated into the city. Rudolph drew a futuristic city with soaring, Space Invader-esque residential towers around the Manhattan and Williamsburg Bridges. The highway would wind beneath a linear city, and modular housing units would be connected by a pod-like monorail system."

Apparently these plans weren't entirely serious, but entertaining nonetheless.

Sort of like the renderings for the Domino Sugar Factory.


[Via Curbed]

6 comments:

  1. Too bad. Those renderings look a hell of a lot more abstract and thoughtful (even vaguely Blade Runner-ish) than the generic boxy crap that will be replacing Domino's.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Whoa, those are gorgeous. Can we build those and Gaudi's art deco rocketship skyscraper, too?

    ReplyDelete
  3. :Looks like the buildings are saying "HELP".

    ReplyDelete
  4. What a cool rendering. The bottom one is so heinous, I can't bear to look at it too long. Maybe another hurricane will wipe them out before anyone moves in.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I prefer the old Havemeyer sugar factory, but I like the bottom pic. Better than the nondescript towers they built in Williamsburg on the waterfront.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Is it a joke that the bottom one seems to spell S-H-O-P?

    ReplyDelete

Your remarks and lively debates are welcome, whether supportive or critical of the views herein. Your articulate, well-informed remarks that are relevant to an article are welcome.

However, commentary that is intended to "flame" or attack, that contains violence, racist comments and potential libel will not be published. Facts are helpful.

If you'd like to make personal attacks and libelous claims against people and businesses, then you may do so on your own social media accounts. Also, comments predicting when a new business will close ("I give it six weeks") will not be approved.