Tuesday, February 11, 2014

Campaign underway to landmark building that the Soho House is developing on Ludlow Street



From the EVG inbox this past weekend…

The Friends of the Lower East Side (FOTLES) and the East Village Community Coalition (EVCC) have launched a drive to advocate for the NYC landmark designation of the former H. Nieberg Funeral Home, a rare intact survivor of the many funeral homes that once served the Jewish community of the Lower East
Side.

A Request for Evaluation for the historic building at 139-141 Ludlow Street was recently submitted to the NYC Landmarks Preservation Commission in collaboration with Friends of Terra Cotta and Kerri Culhane, architectural historian.

Many funeral homes, like H. Nieberg, evolved from livery stables, providing all the necessary arrangements, from removal of the body to burial, and were viewed as important religious structures in the community. The structure spans 143 years and reflects the growth and development of the neighborhood through its changing usage: from a hay and feed store and single dwelling to apartments and a stable, from an automobile garage and Jewish funeral home to a printing plant and high-tech company and, currently, planned for a private members’ club connected to an international network.

In 1925, Harry Nieberg handled the highly publicized funeral and burial of noted gangster Morris Grossman, attracting a crowd of more than 5,000 spectators. Described in 1937 in the New York Evening Post as “the huge and jovial Ludlow Street undertaker,” Harry Nieberg became a well-known figure in New York City during his ownership of the building. He was admired locally for his generosity.

In 1928, The New York Times reported on Nieberg’s efforts to raise funds to bury an impoverished Roman Catholic neighbor. This act of kindness was characteristic of Nieberg who offered twenty-five free funerals a year to impoverished New Yorkers.

Politically, Nieberg was celebrated for challenging the corruption of Tammany Hall, although his Congressional campaigns in 1935 and 1937 – against Christopher D. Sullivan, brother of Tammany boss “Big Tim” Sullivan – were not successful.

You can find the petition here.

After a long battle, the Soho House won approval for a liquor license here last October. Reps for Soho House had reportedly agreed to work with preservationists to protect the building's facade.

BoweryBoogie got a look inside the building last year.

6 comments:

  1. Isn't that the building that used to house Torch, one of the earlier swanky gentrified bars (supper club, I guess) on the LES? Like back in the mid to late 90s? I think it is. I have wondered for a long time what, if anything, was there in the interim. I was inside Torch once and although I can't remember it exactly, I would suspect that they've already made a lot of structural changes to the interior space, so it's likely that if it's landmarked, it's mainly the facade that would be protected.

    ReplyDelete
  2. The link to the petition isn't working! Petition seems to be down. Dang…I'd sign it…ten times!

    ReplyDelete
  3. @ anon 9:15

    The link works now. There was some funky character in the address!

    ReplyDelete
  4. that building is a beauty! landmark it stat!!!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Ken from Ken's KitchenFebruary 11, 2014 at 10:23 AM

    If I had to bet on Friends of the Lower East Side vs Soho House, I'm guessing Soho House scores a knockout in the first round. Too bad. But then "too bad" is the appropriate response to just about everything that happens in the neighborhood these days.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Signed, but I doubt LPC will do anything as Soho House is run by a guy connected to the Clinton family who DeBlasio is connected to.

    ReplyDelete

Your remarks and lively debates are welcome, whether supportive or critical of the views herein. Your articulate, well-informed remarks that are relevant to an article are welcome.

However, commentary that is intended to "flame" or attack, that contains violence, racist comments and potential libel will not be published. Facts are helpful.

If you'd like to make personal attacks and libelous claims against people and businesses, then you may do so on your own social media accounts. Also, comments predicting when a new business will close ("I give it six weeks") will not be approved.