Monday, August 24, 2020

Local elected officials wants answers on the status of officer accused of police brutality on Avenue D


[Screengrab from video taken by Daquan Owens]

Local community leaders and elected officials gathered on Thursday afternoon to demand action against Officer Francisco Garcia for the violent arrest of an East Village resident on May 2.

During the press conference at Ninth Street and Avenue D, the group called on NYPD Commissioner Dermot Shea and Mayor de Blasio to stop delaying their investigation and fire Garcia ... and for Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance to file criminal charges.

Garcia, who's stationed at PS4 on Avenue C, was put on a desk assignment following the ugly confrontation when an attempt to enforce social distancing rules escalated on a spring Saturday afternoon.

Garcia and his partners originally approached a man and a woman outside the corner deli on Ninth and D over a lack of social distancing, police officials previously said. This encounter reportedly led to an arrest on marijuana and weapons charges.

As seen in a widely circulated video shot by a witness, Garcia, who was not in uniform, then walked toward several bystanders, including Donni Wright, a nearby resident who works for the NYCHA. Police officials originally said that Wright took a "fighting stance," which led Garcia to shout the n-word and brandish a taser before wrestling Wright to the ground and kneeling on his head. (See top image.)

Social justice activists and local elected officials have pointed out the similar tactics in this arrest with that of now-former Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin, who knelt on the neck of George Floyd for more than eight minutes before he died on May 25.

Wright was arrested and was initially charged with assaulting an officer, menacing, resisting arrest, obstructing governmental administration and disorderly conduct. The charges were later deferred by the DA's office. Wright has filed a $50 million lawsuit against the city.



In late May, The New York Times reported that the officers involved would face disciplinary charges.

Per the Times on May 29:

Investigators with the New York Police Department have recommended misconduct charges against three police officers, including one who sat and knelt on the neck and upper torso of a man he was arresting, a maneuver similar to the one used in the death of George Floyd in Minneapolis, two people familiar with the matter said.

It is unclear what charges the officers, including Francisco X. Garcia, will face in connection with the investigation of the May 2 incident ... one of several police encounters that led to accusations of racial bias in the enforcement of social distancing, according to the two people, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss an internal police investigation.

While Garcia has been investigated by Internal Affairs, with a recommendation that departmental charges be filed, police officials haven't provided any updates or offered clarity on why further actions are taking so long. (A police spokesperson told amNew York Metro that "the disciplinary process is ongoing.")

"We shouldn't have to stand here almost four months later demanding justice from a system that's supposed to protect our community," said local City Councilwoman Carlina Rivera on Thursday. "When we ask for the firing and criminal charges for Officer Garcia, we're asking them to make it clear that police abuse is unacceptable in any form. It’s a disgrace that six years after the death of Eric Garner and his denied justice, the de Blasio administration continues to deny justice for Black and brown communities. This must end."


And from Manhattan Borough President Gale Brewer: "Policing only works when police have the public's trust. Officer Garcia violated that trust when he knelt on Donni Wright's neck while attempting to arrest him for social distancing violations. The NYPD also violated that trust when they continued to have Garcia on the force even after multiple instances of prior misconduct. Officer Garcia must be held accountable: He must be fired from the police department and should face charges."

The city has paid out nearly $200,000 to settle lawsuits involving Garcia, an eight-year veteran, Gothamist reported.

Previously on EV Grieve:
In aftermath of Avenue D arrests, pols want answers from city on how social distancing is being enforced

Investigation for excessive force demanded after social-distancing arrests on Avenue D

Caravan protest on Avenue C addresses racial bias and police violence in social-distancing arrests

12 comments:

  1. People should send emails and calls to the Mayor's office the NYC Police Commissioner's office to take action on this investigation and proceed in a transparent manner.

    ReplyDelete
  2. This occurred the same weekend that smiling officers were handing out masks to the public in Tompkins Square Park. I don't understand why the city hangs on to employees who are financial liabilities; I don't think it's all city unions. Who else has that kind of job security?

    ReplyDelete
  3. I remember that. Such an appalling scene. That cop needs to be fired and charged with assault.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Take away qualified immunity, make the cops pay out of their own pockets when they flagrantly violate the law, and there'll be a lot less of this bullshit.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Cops should never have been involved in any of the social distancing mask ideology.

    ReplyDelete
  6. "social distancing mask ideology."

    really? do you believe the Earth is a pancake too?

    ReplyDelete
  7. ideology - yes, there is Sweden on one hand and New Zealand on another and the Phillipines and then the US somewhere in between, depending on the state's governor. in England social distancing is 1 meter. Why is that. The science does not back up mandatory masks. But everyone should do what makes then feel secure.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Such a great example of why the police can never be reformed, and must be defunded. The institution cannot respond, even when confronted by clear proof of terrible abuse. Of course this man should be fired and charged, but their corrupted system can't allow that, and that's one of the reasons why they must go.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I am not a law enforcement employee of any type, never have been and never will. Which is why I wouldn't condemn this cop or others so quickly. So easy to point fingers from afar like most of the people who commented here. From an outside point of view it does look bad but how do you know how threatened the copy felt when passersby and bystanders cheer on the violators and incite others to physical violence against police officers? The answer is, you don't. It is not a smart idea to intervene or attempt to intervene with police officers attempting to do their job. Resisting arrest and disobeying police officers in the process of carrying out what they see is their job is a criminal offense. If our dumbass Mayor and Governor would reverse the no bail system of "justice" maybe more people would think twice about interfering. So get real people. This is not some game.

    ReplyDelete
  10. "Why is that. The science does not back up mandatory masks. But everyone should do what makes then feel secure."

    Science backs up wearing masks the problem is Governors in some states don't care about their state's citizens lives, they trying to win favor with Trump.

    ReplyDelete
  11. @ 9:57 PM

    That's not correct. The science regarding masks is now clear. The "mandatory" in your comment betrays your agenda.

    ReplyDelete
  12. If you can't keep your calm in challenging situations, you shouldn't be a cop. Period.

    ReplyDelete

Your remarks and lively debates are welcome, whether supportive or critical of the views herein. Your articulate, well-informed remarks that are relevant to an article are welcome.

However, commentary that is intended to "flame" or attack, that contains violence, racist comments and potential libel will not be published. Facts are helpful.

If you'd like to make personal attacks and libelous claims against people and businesses, then you may do so on your own social media accounts. Also, comments predicting when a new business will close ("I give it six weeks") will not be approved.