Your remarks and lively debates are welcome, whether supportive or critical of the views herein. Your articulate, well-informed remarks that are relevant to an article are welcome.
However, commentary that is intended to "flame" or attack, that contains violence, racist comments and potential libel will not be published. Facts are helpful.
If you'd like to make personal attacks and libelous claims against people and businesses, then you may do so on your own social media accounts. Also, comments predicting when a new business will close ("I give it six weeks") will not be approved.
I’ve seen a few sweaters in that same pattern as this building.
ReplyDelete
ReplyDeleteNot as bad as it could have been... But where's the cornice that appeared on the renderings? Does that come later?
It's looks like a penthouse setback will be added, so no cornice. This is very different from the rendering, which is how they got this approved so quickly. The original looks lovely; this not so.
ReplyDeleteLike everyone said, they should be required to put in the main architectural element that made people accept this building! The cornice! A bait and switch of removing it and then adding in a penthouse to the design is both dishonest and ugly.
ReplyDeleteI genuinely wonder how developers get away with removing elements that are key to the deign.
I *guess* it's still possible that they're building it .... but I highly highly doubt it.
Looks like a jailhouse.
ReplyDeleteOr a college freshmen dorm
the sealed windows really inspire!
ReplyDeleteDoes anyone know if the former tenants are going to have an opportunity to move back into any of these units?
ReplyDeleteUgly and sad.
ReplyDelete